Without hesitation, choose local governments from top and bottom line disputes

Professor Wang Hongchen believes that there are significant differences between the two stages of sludge treatment and disposal at Renmin University of China. Firstly, it emphasizes the need to solve the problem of sludge, and based on this, relevant standards must be derived. Firstly, a clear disposal direction must be established, followed by the selection of processing technology, as well as the formation and payment of business models. Sludge disposal is related to its ultimate goal, not a technical issue, it should be handled by a specific national technology enterprise.

He believes that the slow progress of sludge disposal work in achieving uniform and consistent directions is an important reason so far. Many local governments, especially for caution, still hold a wait-and-see attitude towards business losses.

There are significant differences in the final destination of sludge among land use, incineration, and landfill factions, from top to bottom, from departments to experts. Even the pollutants or resources in sludge are completely different opinions: sludge pollutants, the weight of treating and disposing of environmental safety, are considered resources, and the emphasis is on the comprehensive utilization of composite fungicides.

The debate is most concentrated on whether the utilization of sludge land in the surrounding area is a concern. The reporter learned that at the ministerial level, the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Finance have always advocated for heavy metal control standards and access to land; Advocates of environmental protection cannot enter agriculture and can be used for the transformation of sandy land. Opponents of agriculture firmly believe that even if the standards do not work. Disputes over incineration routes between different departments.